Organized tours to remote community and other countries are increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment?
In recent times, it is observed that tourism to faraway areas such as mountainous or isolated spots has evolved into popularity. Due to this phenomenon, some people wonder whether it is advantageous or not to both the locals and the nature in the target areas and personally the benefits it offers seem to outweigh the drawbacks to some extent.
First of all, regarding indigenous people there are various sorts of benefits they can receive from this change. Apparently, the residents can increase their income by involving in several businesses and services such as hospitality, food and beverage and transportation. To take Ha Giang as an example, since the bombardment of tourists to some villages and towns, the locals have increasingly erected a wide range of accommodation which never existed before. Also thanks to the development of tourism and their income, the residents can acquire better services and facilities while it was difficult for them to approach them because of financial shortage or transportation difficulties.
Moreover, many people take environmental issues into account in those places whenever mentioning tourism. In fact, a plenty of tourist attractions have been severely damaged by humans around the world but conserving the nature and surroundings has been concentrated more acutely these days. People are now aware of how crucial the ecology is thanks to press and social media; therefore they acknowledge that they have to protect the environment together with the locals in order not to aggravate the unspoiled destination. Tourists or travellers join environmental charity, or participate in voluntary activities to help maintain the natural and wild beauty of all areas.
To conclude, even though remote communities seem to be influenced by the remarkable growth of the smokeless industry, the negativity is minor, in comparison with the positivity. It is evidently beneficial to not only the indigenous but also the native ecology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-24 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-12 | ntth492 | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | darshan lal | 86 | view |
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that sports play an important role in the development of society Others think they are nothing more than a leisure activity Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many crimes are often related to the consumption of alcohol Some people think that the best way to reduce crime rate is to ban alcohol Do you think this is an effective way measure against crime What other solutions can you suggest 84
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 84
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...commodation which never existed before. Also thanks to the development of tourism an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41883116883 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0435276905 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1583473228 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154598820733 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428757779131 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382387150928 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787624337762 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014123179378 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.