It is sometimes said that countries should produce all the food for their populations to eat and import as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes believed that the government in some countries should be self-efficient in providing food for their entire residents and import as least as possible. While I understand the logic behind this suggestion, I still firmly disagree with it for several reasons.
Those who believe that the authorities should grow all crops and limit imports may have several arguments. They may well argue that farmers can have more agricultural works to do helping them have a better life. This is because if all the plants are grown in their countries, the food demand will increase which can lead to the fact that farmers can have more works to do, thereby improving their life. Another possible argument is that the food's price in the markets and supermarkets will decrease which can allow people to better their financial families. This benefit stems from the fact that food does not need to be transferred from many countries which can reduce the transportation fee, therefore citizens can easily buy food to eat without costing a lot of money.
Nevertheless, I still oppose this view for several reasons. Chief among these is that If the government limits imports, this action will reduce the variety of food choices. The reason for this is that each country has weather conditions and geographical features thereby affecting the growth of crops. In tropical countries, for example, in Viet Nam, farmers can not grow many fruits such as apples, cherries, and so on since the tropical climate is not an ideal temperature for these fruits to develop. The second factor is that there will be an increase in the proportion of unemployment if once importing is reduced. The export companies can not make a profit due to the limits of import policies, therefore they have to release their staff in order to ease the salary fund.
In conclusion, It is understandable why some may argue that countries must produce their own food for entire nations and limit impots. However, I can not support such a view given the aforementioned reasons
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-01 | ng duc minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | Koi | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
- It is sometimes said that countries should produce all the food for their populations to eat and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Agree or disagree 78
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disagree with it for several reasons. Those who believe that the authorities s...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to eat without costing a lot of money. Nevertheless, I still oppose this view f...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...taff in order to ease the salary fund. In conclusion, It is understandable why ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96774193548 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67614228231 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536656891496 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7835078032 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23191593343 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763829139295 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561028961712 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150856849616 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424189153249 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disagree with it for several reasons. Those who believe that the authorities s...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to eat without costing a lot of money. Nevertheless, I still oppose this view f...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...taff in order to ease the salary fund. In conclusion, It is understandable why ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96774193548 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67614228231 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536656891496 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7835078032 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23191593343 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763829139295 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561028961712 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150856849616 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424189153249 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.