It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree?
Teachers are of vital importance to help students to learn: they can impart numerous knowledge into students; they can offer tailor-made suggestions on how to study; they can target students who need help and thus solve their problems. From my pespective, being both popular and effective in helping students is achieveable.
First, students are more likely to actively involved in the popular teachers' courses and thus learn effectively. As a matter of fact, teachers who are popular among students are distinguished by their teaching methods, speaking style, personalities and so on. All these special characters would attract students to have their courses and hence students are more likely to actively involved in the class. As a result, they can understand the materials easily. My personal experience can be a compelling example of this. In my university, one of the professor was widely recognizable for his humorous speaking style and special teaching methods, using his own experience to explain complex term. These two factors make him well popular among students, attracting many students to register for his class. Whenever he ask questions in class, there are always a number of students raising their hands to answer the questions. By actively involve in the course, those students can learn effectively.
Second, popular teachers can decrease the absenteeism rate and ensure that students can attend the lecture physically on time. Indeed, never do students want to miss out the courses taught by their favorite teachers. In this case, they would always show up in the class and thus assimilate knowledge from their professors. Take the case of my professor, a man who once participated in a debate contest and thus won many followers among students, as an example. During his class, never did any students miss the class based on their fanatic about him and therefore they were predisposed to take every word on their notebooks. Therefore, they can learn effectively driven by themselves.
Admittedly, a vocie arises that a not popular teachers with strict teaching styles can force students to practice much and thus learn more from it. Ironically, students fail to learn much since they were not driven by themselves to study. As a result, even they would fulfill all the practice, they would complete casually or even copy another one's schoolwork. Under this circumstance, learning effectiveness can not bu ensured.
In a nutshell, it is not challenging for teachers to be not only well liked by students but also enables students to learn effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | Hossein2000 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Storyline | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | AgnesYY | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | AliKopol | 73 | view |
- The best way for parents to teach their children about responsibility is to have the children care for an animal 3
- Which one do you think is the most important for high school teacher age from 15 to 18 1 the ability to give students advice to plan for their future 2 the ability to find which students need help and provide them with help 3 the ability to encourage stud 73
- Government should not provide financial support to artists For example painters writer musicians and the government should let them support themselves 88
- TPO72 80
- Some students prefer to choose smaller classes with fewer students professors can know each student s name while others prefer to take bigger classes with lots of students Which do you prefer and why 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asks'.
Suggestion: asks
... to register for his class. Whenever he ask questions in class, there are always a ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24396135266 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80077124867 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8209080391 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6818181818 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306441321644 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105501552973 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100395723626 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219578222311 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976403086231 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.