summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they challenge specific claims made in the reading passage.
In the lecture, the professor mentioned several points about the validity of the man’s memoir. The professor argues that the memoirs are indeed accurate as the man has written them. However, the author of the passage argues that the memoirs are not accurate and exaggerated. The professor’s lecture casts doubt on the reading by using a number of points that are contrary to the points stated in the passage.
The first point that the professor uses to cast doubt on the passage is the fact that properties that were sold then required time in order to retrieve the money. The author of the reading however stated that he would not have to borrow money if he was truly rich. The point made by the professor cast doubt on the reading because the man had to borrow money to throw parties while waiting for the money for his sold properties since it took time to receive payment for properties sold.
Another point that the professor uses is the fact that the man always wrote down the account of his conversation every night as much as he could remember. The passage contends that there was no way he could have remembered his conversations from years before he wrote the memoir. The professor however argues that witnesses could attest to his written conversations and how he regularly consults his notes.
Also, the professor mentioned another point about the escape from prison. The author believes that he must have paid his really powerful friends to bring him out of prison but the professor argues that other prisoners had even more powerful friends who could have freed them but could not free them. The professor also stated that it was confirmed by the government that the ceiling of his room in the prison had to be repaired after he escaped.
In conclusion, the professor made several points that contrast with the reading and demonstrate that the reading is in doubt.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-15 | thelmascakess | 73 | view |
- The following appeared in the City Council Proceedings section of the local newspaper in Smithville The city council of Smithville has recommended making changes to police procedures to improve the visibility of the police force These changes include hiri 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A university education should be provided free of charge to all interested scholars use examples and reasons to support your position 60
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they challenge specific claims made in the reading passage 73
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the contents of the reading You may refer to the passage as you write 73
- Tusk University should build a new recreational facility both to attract new students and to better serve the needs of our current student body Tusk projects that enrollment will double over the next 10years based on current trends The new student body is 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed time in order to retrieve the money. The author of the reading however stated th...
^^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e to borrow money if he was truly rich. The point made by the professor cast doubt ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, so, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81230769231 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39838999252 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446153846154 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4926616284 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118405988071 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535291072252 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565068853718 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908946577807 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665624886843 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.