In some cities, there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings, and owners can decide on the style of their houses. Do the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks?
Nowadays, house and building owners, living in parts of urban areas, may determine their free concept and style of those regardless of infrastructural policy. Personally, I consent to be more disadvantageous sides of this issue which will be elaborated in the forthcoming paragraph.
On the one side, in my stand point, to be lack of some regulations imposed for designing and constructing a building probably increase numerous illegal housings which are built semi-permanent ones, especially in restricted area. Not only is the landscape of the city outlay spoilt, but also the unhealthy life will increase; regarding the contaminated sanitation. Furthermore, if such policy is not imposed, the number of land clearance would incline, due to developing business area including hotels and restaurants. In terms of the environmental issue, more and more pollutants will bring on unprecedented climate change.
On the flip side, perhaps, this issue probably allows people to construct some buildings in the low-cost rate assisting those who could not deal with legal building style. In conjunction with its expenditure, masses could reduce cost of materials used and later achieve an owned house. In addition, the architectural consultants/firms could freely receive all of the customised work of construction either residential or commercial, even industrial projects. To illustrate, to build natural-hotel concept, the architect could opt the location of property along forested areas to offer the best service.
To sum up, the lack of policy-making regarding home design and construction could bring several merits to some extent. However, I claim that spoiling the city concept and lowering green-opened land are its more debatable demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Andi Irwan Nur | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Andi Irwan Nur | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Andi Irwan Nur | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Andi Irwan Nur | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-13 | Andi Irwan Nur | 78 | view |
- the chart below gives information on internet use at home in Australia between 2010 and 2011 100
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Nowadays people tend to have children at an older age Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 73
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individual and society suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impacts of ageing population 80
- In some cities there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings and owners can decide on the style of their houses Do the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... consultants/firms could freely receive all of the customised work of construction either ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, as to, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61742424242 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22961707069 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7082045733 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181212423529 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568945555071 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557589710954 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104719012052 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113398349904 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.