In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are these problems? How might they be reduced?
In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are these problems? How might they be reduced?
Over the past decades, many countries in the world have seen quick economic growth. As a result, the people of big cities in these nations increase their living standards compared to the people of pastoral areas. There are several reasons why this problem occurred and necessary steps taken by both government and the public to overcome the situation.
First of all, the predominant problems resulting in rapid economic development in certain areas are increasing crimes in the whole country and reducing the cultural diversity of these nations. Crime is directly proportional to overall job availability. In other words, if one area of any particular country suddenly improves overall conditions, it means they have abundant job opportunities in their hand. What happens to other portions, they do not find those facilities, so they cannot improve their living standards. So, they quickly tend to heinous crimes. Consequently, the crime rate is increased dramatically. Another cause of these problems is the loss of many indigenous cultures. For example, In Bangladesh, about 90% of industries are located in Dhaka, the capital of this country. People need to come here if they want to find a job. People who live in tribal communities also need to do this. This is why, they have learned new customs and new languages. By doing these things regularly, they steadily lose their heritage.
Initially, there are potential ways to solve these problems or at least mitigate the effects. The finest path to solve these is for governments should decentralize economic development. If they can bring more jobs to rural areas or areas where indigenous people live, the two main problems might solve. For instance, the government of South Korea faced the same problem after 1990. They also did the same to eradicate the problem. It is also the responsibility of big companies to open more branches in the countryside.
To conclude, although it is a serious issue, there are steps governments and individuals can take to reduce its effects. If we are to save our country and community, this must be treated as a priority for all concerned.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-25 | songuyen14 | 73 | view |
2023-08-25 | songuyen14 | 82 | view |
2023-01-11 | fighttosurvey | 73 | view |
2023-01-11 | fighttosurvey | 78 | view |
2023-01-10 | fighttosurvey | 84 | view |
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are the 73
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are the 84
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are the 84
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are the 78
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are the 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, at least, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11027568922 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77088043876 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558897243108 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6593891591 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.8214285714 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39285714286 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412184482733 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106294726497 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149593055734 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270681978041 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.265725588724 0.056905535591 467% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.