With the advancement in technology, the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased. Some people believe that there will be no role for teachers in the classroom.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the technology industry has witnessed dramatic development, it is thought by some that computers will take the place of teachers in the education field. While I agree that computers are taking part in more and more aspects of education, I believe that education still needs human teachers because of their mental support.
Providing learners with personalized learning and more accurate knowledge could be regarded as two major benefits of computer-based learning. Digital learning tools can provide learners with active learning conditions in which they are free to choose the place and time to study, leading to the better acquisition of knowledge as well as academic results. Moreover, while teachers, as humans can make some mistakes during lessons, computers would always impart up-to-date knowledge accurately.
On the other hand, I believe that teachers would never lose their vital role in the classroom. To achieve much success in studying while learning with the computer, students need to have great self-discipline. However, not all students are born with this ability. Therefore, the promotion and vision of teachers are essential in classes to ensure the effectiveness of the lessons and the academic performance of learners. Moreover, although computers can provide more exact knowledge than teachers, they could not support students’ personal matters. There might not have been any computers that could help students with their financial aid, confide with students to reduce their mental problems, or visit their houses to ask about the students’ health issues.
In conclusion, although some people hold the opinion that computers could replace teachers, I totally disagree with this statement because of the indispensable human connection with students that only teachers can create.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | linh allie | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows the information for internet users as percentage of population in three countries from 1999 and 2009 78
- In recent years there has been an increase in bad behavior poor discipline and antisocial behavior in schools Tough measures and stricter punishments by schools parents and others are necessary to stop this trend What are the advantages and disadvantages 84
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 73
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 84
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59272727273 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79586471492 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570909090909 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0077395381 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207337531449 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792609222918 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614233532419 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135246726452 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520867445535 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.