Alternative energy source that use the natural power of the wind, waves, and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal, oil, and gas that we use to power our cities and transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the entire world, non-renewable energy is irreplaceable with old-fashioned resources to supply the power of city's infrastructures due to cost and installation. Personally, I share the same perspective of this issue for reasonable points which will be elucidated more below.
Nowadays, natural resources producing unlimited quantity rather than fossil fuels could be long-lasting power for generations to generations. The developing method of renewable energies (wind and waves) has found the way out of replacing common energy which the civilasation consumes as daily basis. Consequently, the scarcity of natural supply would be the minor worldwide issue. Moreover, the eco-friendly process produced by the conversion of alternative resources might be the most-needed future energy with regard to carbon emission harming the environment, applying a solar system could be an appropriate option, since it would decrease air pollution.
On the other hand, the prevelant technology to process the limited sources (coal and gas) both in converter and transmission machine has been qualified by technical and validity test over centuries. In conjunction with that, the devices are handly imitated by each city to energize itself, hence, the generated energy could be adopted by wide community in every region. Furthemore, uncomplicated transformation of the oil process impacts inexpensive infrastructure outlay. In connection with that, to distribute the gasoline simply utilises a tanker without constructing transmission infrastructure from the conversion centre to gas stations. As a result, cost of the vehicle fuel is affordable by all people with various economical background.
In summary, it appears to me that shifting fossil fuels to renewable energy brings drawbacks that the operated machines have continuously been proven effectively well-distributed and economical fuel might be distributed to the isolated region. This is as long as the natural power is more applicable around the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-08 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | akmalfikri1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | akmalfikri1 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | milad_salehi2002 | 73 | view |
| 2015-09-02 | broerjuang | 79 | view |
- It is always wrong to keep animals in captivity for instance in zoos How far do you share this view 78
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problems do you think youth unemployment causes for individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 78
- Alternative energy source that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Some people think that in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However other people believe that the life of old people is much better now than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problems do you think youth unemployment causes for individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, well, in summary, as a result, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77966101695 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29967223046 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4946262641 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.153846154 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168465055003 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590354263249 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383092206354 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966951117078 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140380199082 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.