The chart shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The chart gives information about the sales figures for the five leading cell phone corporations, including Samsung, Apple, Nokia, LG, and ZTE from 2009 to 2013.
In general, it is apparent that both Nokia and Samsung were dominant in the market, making the most market share. In contrast, the global sales of Apple, LG, and ZTE were significantly lower.
Looking at the two highest manufacturers, in 2009, Nokia played an important part in the global cell phone market, accounting for over 400 million units, which was almost twice the units sold by the second highest-selling producer - Samsung. In the next two years, there was a great increase in sales units worldwide for the Samsung brand, whereas Nokia underwent a slight decline. In the last examined year, it turned out that Samsung experienced a dramatical surge, standing at approximately 450 million units, which made this brand become the strongest company in the mobile phone market. On the contrary, Nokia’s global sales plummeted to 250 million units. This figure was around half of the starting examined period.
Turning to the other manufacturers, it is interesting that the sales figures of Apple brand made up a minority size in 2009 and then witnessed a drastic rise up to more than 100 million units in 2013. Meanwhile, the LG company gradually dropped from 110 million units to around 80 million units. In addition, ZTE sold about 50 million mobile phones in 2009, and this figure remained stable during the rest of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | PhucHuynh | 100 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | AYUSH BOTHRA | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | BÙI QUỐC VƯƠNG | 78 | view |
- Topic It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of preschool age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their children Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, then, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07630522088 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63514705472 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9957251203 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230486289825 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881093590643 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674896000944 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146586634987 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621986737036 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.