Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like. Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion
While some people believe that students should be allowed to study whatever they like, others argue that college studies should only be limited to practical and prospective fields such as technology and science. In my opinion, I believe that striking a balance between these two ideas would be the best approach.
Advocates of complete freedom of choice in college studies point out that students will likely be dedicated and passionate about their desired studies. When students freely pursue their courses, they are likely to be engrossed in any academic subject, leading to better academic performance and retention of lesson-related information. Additionally, choosing college studies without restriction will enable students to tap into their innate talents and use them to apply to their chosen fields, resulting in a more fulfilling college experience and a greater sense of personal development. For example, a would-be first-year student passionate about Vietnamese literature may take a Vietnamese language, poetry and culture course. This will help foster a deeper understanding of Vietnamese culture and history and improve Vietnamese language proficiency and critical thinking among students.
Critics of unfettered academic freedom bolster the belief that students should be limited to studying practical fields such as science and technology due to their utility in developing human civilization and promising career prospects. As our society grows, especially in the era of Artificial Intelligence, it is imperative to have a tech-savvy youthful future workforce well-equipped with the knowledge of technology and science to keep pace with the rapidly evolving global landscape. Students studying science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) will likely get well-paid jobs and higher career opportunities. A perfect example is the global job market, with a continuously high demand for tech workers and high-paid salaries. Although both arguments have valid points, achieving a balance between personal interests and practical considerations is essential when deciding to pursue a course of study.
In conclusion, the debate about whether students should study whatever they like or only subjects such as technology or science remains contentious, with valid arguments on both sides. I believe that promoting a balance between the two approaches is feasible and appropriate. The college experience should be transformative as it enables students to become more informed and well-educated while preparing them for future job demands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-23 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
- There are more advertisements aimed at children Some people believe that they have negative effects on children and should be banned Do you agree or disagree 84
- The most common solution for criminal behaviour is a prison but many believe education is a better method To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 2 Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some feel executives in large companies shoud receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Compare traditional learning and online learning 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two ideas would be the best approach. Advocates of complete freedom of choice ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and critical thinking among students. Critics of unfettered academic freedom b...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... deciding to pursue a course of study. In conclusion, the debate about whether ...
^^^
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...s feasible and appropriate. The college experience should be transformative as it enables ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.824933687 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03790545411 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564986737401 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4646899875 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.4 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44523715493 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136501603933 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140319886649 0.0667982634062 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298758278763 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130819301819 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.