Today, advanced science and technology have made great changes to people's life, but artists are still valued high such as musicians, painters and writers. What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
It is technological revolution rather than arts. which are thought highly of for its values and functions, that brings out variations in our lifestyle and anything relevant. Still, artists are precious assets for mankind, benefiting all in a way that science and technology can never achieve.
Despite creativity found in both arts and technology, the former is directed toward true beauty in life and nature. Aesthetics is one of the skills we develop from engaging in artistic events when we learn to grow a taste for collocation of colours, for example. In reality, we are informed and aware of the fact that red-colored items are not compatible with green ones. The simple thing above requires no technique but artistic capabilities. Referring to antiques, heritage and relics, we assess and evaluate them from the artistic and historical perspective, we are educated about recorded details about a previous period when our ancestors led a different life and followed distinctive rituals and traditions, which are only preserved as a string of digits in the database.
Compared with technology which is programmed with algorithm to serve practical purposes, arts are more provocative in making us flexible. Arts help us to form a perception or interpretation so that we change our plans or schemes when sensing the switch in situations. We are not inspired by a piece of equipment or an application to create a song, a painting or a craft, on the other hand, we create from nothing into reality. In other words, arts teach us to think out of box, to not be bound with rules.
In conclusion, we do enjoy an easier life in travelling, working or entertaining with electronic devices, but we gain the appreciate of beauty and historical values, as well as original creativity only when we start to appreciate arts.
- Full time students should take a lot of time to study but it is also essential to be involved in other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...hnological revolution rather than arts. which are thought highly of for its values an...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ng with electronic devices, but we gain the appreciate of beauty and historical values, as wel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06312292359 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93497480523 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594684385382 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3556804753 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.230769231 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163598683088 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595291600283 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489646586528 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986907440613 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565250761611 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.