The government should spend money on university education or on the education of young children?
Some people believe that the government should spend more money on the education of young students, while others tend to think that it is better to spend monetary funds on university education. Nevertheless, this dispute remains unresolved. Personally, I concur with the latter opinion; university education is more important, so it should receive greater attention. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the reasons and examples that substantiate my viewpoint.
First, university education is a crucial part of our education, as it provides us with broader knowledge and widens our horizons. If college education will be funded by the government, then it is most likely that students will master their courses, acquire necessary skills, and land a good job. My recent experience is a good case in point. After my schooling, I was required to support my family financially, but I was unable to get a job because of my low academic credentials. On the contrary, as soon as I completed my university degree, I was offered many job positions.
Second, university education is quite expensive as compared to elementary education. The education of younger students is quite affordable and does not need to be funded by the government. Instead, this could lead to a lack of motivation for studies, and they may be distracted due to the absence of any accountability. Students pursuing education are grown up and mature, and they are completely aware of and stressed about their career. For instance, I hail from a peasant family that couldn't afford my expensive higher education, but fortunately I was offered a scholarship that motivated me to complete my studies, and I managed to get a high-paying job.
In conclusion, I want to reaffirm my point that the government should spend its money on the education provided by universities. To recapitulate, university education is crucial and expensive. Therefore, due to the aforementioned reasons, I feel this way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | Anurag96 | 76 | view |
| 2022-04-26 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 70 | view |
| 2016-08-24 | Rahul Keswani | 73 | view |
| 2016-08-23 | Rahul Keswani | 73 | view |
- Advertisements 76
- Development in technology can led people to enjoy longer lives 80
- People should alway try to do something new in their lives 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because today s world is so busy and crowded we should not expect people to be polite to one another 83
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it Touring historic sites going to markets or shops eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ance, I hail from a peasant family that couldnt afford my expensive higher education, b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19182389937 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16102812537 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553459119497 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.93314099 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1176470588 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339648584518 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111831650487 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131382540398 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243228375567 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132186482456 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.