The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The graph compares the proportion of goods exported by Australia to Japan, the USA, China and India between 1990 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that before 2005, Japan accounted for the highest proportion of Australian exports. However, exports to China overcame exports to Japan after 2005.
In 1990, exports to Japan took up 27% of the total export, this figure was over double the figure for Australian exports to the USA. By contrast, exports to China and India made up about 2% and 1% respectively. However, in 1995, the percentage of Australian exports to Japan fell to 20% and exports to the USA decreased to around 9% while the figures for China and India rose slightly.
It is also noticeable that Japan saw a gradual decline in the percentage of exports for the rest of the period, which end at around 18% in 2012. From 1995 to 2012, the US export market fluctuated, but the trend tended to fall and hit a low of 6% in 2010. Although exports to India also fluctuated, these increased and finished at 6% at the end of the period. There was a dramatic change in the growth of the Chinese export market, crossing over Japan at a figure of 19% in 2005 and reaching a peak at 30% in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | dieulinhhhh | view | |
| 2023-09-02 | dieulinhhhh | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | thaoduong1902 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | NguyenVanAnh | view |
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who is responsible for preventing environmental damage 84
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this case and what solutions are possible 78
- The diagram below shows the steps of processing cocoa beans Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of people 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55760368664 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45535212576 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4462632671 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170254488603 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818930500096 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383687795618 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115995739333 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280007747538 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.