Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In light of the benefits of scientific analysis for the globe, scientists are currently debating whether it is more suitable for governments to manage them instead of the companies led by other owners. I hold the belief that organizations outside authorized investment funds provide more advantages for two following prominent reasons.
Firstly, there is an inadequate expenditure that the governments pay on scientific research. The authorities have more significant and pressing issues to address domestic problems such as political, economic, and agricultural weaknesses to intercontinental challenges like climate change, global warming, or long-term political settlement among countries rather than doing a study on specific objectives investigations. As a result, money flowing into these procedures by private communities is more appealing to researchers through valuable rewards, which leads to brilliant chances to enhance science-related fields in various nations. A good example is that decreasing scientific competitions have been organized by political leaders as the result of a lack of investment.
Another notable factor is the number of employment opportunities created and supportive knowledge brought by outside capitalism. For instance, because foreign nations tend to put money into less affluent countries that have potential technological advancement, consequently that these countries can have distinguished opportunities to grasp so that they generate an excess of employment possibilities extensively as well as can be able to enhance their knowledge and have considerable expertise in contemporary technology that is both duplicated and developed by foreign techniques in the imminent future.
In conclusion, due to the prospective merits of private companies, mathematical investigations should not be conducted and managed by the authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-18 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...prospective merits of private companies, mathematical investigations should not b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09811320755 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46260910317 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667924528302 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.294577089 49.4020404114 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.555555556 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135345560217 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558875406211 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474111322306 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776583070479 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456504525768 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.0946893788 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.66 50.2224549098 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.69 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.