Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the context that science has become one of the top-tier concerns of each nation, some argue that scientific projects should be conducted and governed by national institutions rather than private enterprises. From my perspective, both private businesses and governments must share this responsibility to bring about betterment in science.
On the one hand, I agree that national authorities should administrate all science exploration activities to ensure society’s welfare and national security. First and foremost, with a community-oriented mission, governments always prioritize citizen's benefits when researching while private companies may ignore strict standards about quality and infrastructure to save costs. To illustrate, some firms produce low-quality medicine without vigorous examination before launching to the market just to gain more profit resulting in detrimental impacts on patients' health. Secondly, if private organizations are entitled to carry out some scientific fields that directly affect national security without any government supervision, they may create opportunities for terrorists and criminals. To cite an example, a company discovering a chemical that can make biological weapons may sell it to an antisocial party posing a serious threat to society.
On the other hand, while the government should regulate scientific studies for the reasons mentioned above, I suppose that private companies are better candidates for directly conducting and investing in such research. Firstly, unlike authorities that have many aspects to take care of, independent firms often concentrate on only one or two fields, which helps to yield more auspicious results. For instance, instead of being involved in developing solar energy equipment, authorities should assign the implementation to a technology company that already has highly specialized engineers in this area which can create more successful results. Secondly, scientific research requires much money so independent corporations should share this financial burden with governments. More government money invested in scientific programs could lead to an imbalance in national expenses which negatively affect other important sectors such as education and health care.
In conclusion, many people advocate the view that governments should be the key organizers and governors of science exploration. However, I believe that it is more effective if private companies directly take part in scientific studies while the regulators enact policies related to research and supervise strictly the process to ensure social well-being and national safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-18 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 78
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rivate enterprises. From my perspective, both private businesses and governments ...
^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...fit resulting in detrimental impacts on patients health. Secondly, if private organizati...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01595744681 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14029417214 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9796504359 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.571428571 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275448857655 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089966213639 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577016520628 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174772113606 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386709717827 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.