Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the development of technology, computers and mobile phones become more and more vital in personal daily life. While some believed that there are many drawbacks affecting people’s reading and writing skills if people spend more time using electronic devices to communicate, the advantages outweigh.
Nobody can deny that using computers and mobile phones for a long time affects our reading and writing skills a lot. Young people tend to use social media to communicate with others. Yet the information on the internet is not authentic, and if we make reliance on this data, we will have many problems in real life. In addition, exposure to multimedia basis a lot can affect our writing behavior. Because teenagers create and use teen code to reduce texting time and gradually they can have spelling mistakes. That action affects their work and studies a lot because spelling mistakes will make the wrong and invalid document.
Despite the demerits, computers and mobile phones bring young people several positive effects in every aspect. Students can learn new languages through some applications on mobile phones or websites on the internet. They can search many scientific news, documentary or literary work to practice their reading skills. Moreover, people are likely to share their experiences on Facebook, we read it, learn some excellent sentences and simultaneously comment on some of their mistakes. As a result, we can mutually enhance our writing skills.
In addition, there are more advantages than disadvantages to the increasing use of communication through electronic devices. Any applications will be useful if we thoroughly ascertain and use them in an exact way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-16 | Mollymaul | 75 | view |
| 2024-05-18 | lalo | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | wholemilk | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | jessie7777 | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities in year 2010 56
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The graph below shows the average house prices in 3 countries between the years 1997 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much scientific news', 'a good deal of scientific news'.
Suggestion: much scientific news; a good deal of scientific news
...bsites on the internet. They can search many scientific news, documentary or literary work to practi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an exact way" with adverb for "exact"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...if we thoroughly ascertain and use them in an exact way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35580524345 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77711251835 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565543071161 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0286071291 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305083820566 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102213994762 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884383827543 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181559575699 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501010515868 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.