The increasingly wide use of computers in education has decreased the importance of teachers' roles in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the aid of advanced technology, using computers in education has become the norm for schools. This begs the question whether the emergence of computers dilutes the teachers' roles or not. From my perspective, I hold a firm believe that the roles of teachers cannot be substituted by computers.
First, computers cannot replace teachers because of the human relationships. Undoubtedly, there is something about the human connection between students and teachers that matters a lot. The presence of teachers helps students to realize that they are not dealing with a machine but a human being who deserves attention and respect. Furthermore, education is much more complex than spending prolonged periods in front of a faceless machine. It is about the trust and bind between teachers and students that creates a friendly and close-knit environment. In the world now where youngsters are increasingly retracting into virtual unreality, the interactions and relationships among humans should take priority so as to prevent an emotionless society.
Second, the efficiency of computers in teaching pale in comparison with teachers'. While teachers can discern the negative and positive feelings of students in order to adjust teaching methods appropriately, a computer fails to do this job. Moreover, teachers do not simply impart knowledge. They are also the inspirers, facilitators, mentors and leaders who encourage students to strive for their goals.
On the other hand, opponents of my idea may argue that computers' productivity surpass that of teachers as computers do not need breaks on account of bad health or any other personal commitments. However, it is worth pointing out that higher productivity does not always involve spending hours on ends on learning, rather, it should really depend on students'motivation to learn. Hence, I maintain that teachers can never be faded by computers.
In conclusion, I wholeheartedly advocate that computers cannot decrease the importance of teachers. Rather than herald computers as an educational panacea, we should place special emphasis on the roles of teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | An Hai Nguyen | 84 | view |
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 84
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- Many different countries have most shops and products the same Some consider it a positive development whereas others consider it negative Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Nowadays more people move away from their friends and families for work Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some countries have an ever increasing proportion of the population who are aged 15 or younger What do you think are the current and future effects of this trend for those countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
... become the norm for schools. This begs the question whether the emergence of computers dilutes the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 708, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ships among humans should take priority so as to prevent an emotionless society. Second...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'computers'' or 'computer's'?
Suggestion: computers'; computer's
...nd, opponents of my idea may argue that computers productivity surpass that of teachers a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, moreover, really, second, so, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49386503067 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09818532456 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592024539877 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2165689445 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239676778951 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729277435409 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466688406102 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133901403998 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429155937323 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.