The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to
do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any
of his or her inherent skills and abilities.
Most parents desire to see their children reach excellence and have high expectations for their children. In fact, some parents send their children to cram schools before their children are even old enough to enter primary school, so their children can stay one step ahead of their peers academically. However, high expectations do not automatically guarantee high performances because performance is correlated with effort, not expectation, and the definition of a high performance varies from person to person. In addition, People only endeavor when they see the purpose of their hard work. Therefore, holding high expectations for someone does not signify welcoming achievements from that person.
Although students struggle at school for different reasons, many of them struggle because they do not put in the effort to study and revise the knowledge that they have acquired at school. Some students prioritize entertainment over their academic performance and would rather play video games than finish their homework. Others might procrastinate and leave their revision until the last minute. Parents could hold high expectations for their children, but if their children are not willing to put in the effort to study, their children will not achieve well at school and parents will not receive favorable report cards.
A key to motivating people is incentives, not expectations. Instead of expecting children to study hard, the carrot and stick approach (positive and negative incentives) is a more practical method to encourage children to study harder. Parents could reward their children with toys or a trip to the cinema to encourage them to aim for higher grades, and they could confiscate children’s phones to prevent the phones from becoming a distraction. Instead of simply expecting children to produce strong academic performances, parents should use positive and negative incentives to encourage or force students to study.
Some may argue that children would naturally obey their parents and aim to satisfy their parents’ expectations. However, nowadays children are encouraged to think independently, and their parents’ expectations might not be the same as their own. They might not strive to satisfy their parents’ expectations because they have their own goals, despite their parents holding high expectations for them. In conclusion, expectations do not equate performance, and incentives are essential for people who hold expectations for others to gain desired results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | Mateo Chen | 13 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Jbrachael | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | Thelmacakes | 50 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | alexdipierro24 | 79 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | Prash | 58 | view |
- Most of the money devoted to basic scientific research should instead be diverted to applied scientific research 50
- The director of the International Health Foundation recently released this announcement A new medical test that allows the early detection of a particular disease will prevent the deaths of people all over the world who would otherwise die from the diseas 60
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of the Juniper Caf a small local coffee shop in the downtown area of a small American city We must reduce overhead here at the caf Instead of opening at 6 a m weekdays we will now open at 8 a m On week 78
- Scientific theories which most people consider as fact almost invariably prove to be inaccurate Thus one should look upon any information described as factual with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future Write an essay in which you take 83
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... or force students to study. Some may argue that children would naturally obey thei...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56544502618 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91902542133 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502617801047 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6747901363 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.058823529 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0256936712933 0.243740707755 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0105699850293 0.0831039109588 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0162031869402 0.0758088955206 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0196510826637 0.150359130593 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00829056633268 0.0667264976115 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.