Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe people should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, some people argue that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be restricted to continue their careers in the countries where they finished their education. However, in my opinion, people should be set free to work wherever they wish.
On one side of the argument, some people hold the view that governments should impose mandatory regulations to keep graduated youngsters. The main purpose is to avoid brain drain which can result in the downfall of a nation. For instance, some countries like USA, UK, and India are facing a lack of expertized professionals as increasingly more young people are moving abroad in search of better job opportunities. Another reason for believing this is that outstanding students are given scholarships and tuition fees by the government. Therefore, those students are expected to provide the service for the countries in return for the study grants.
However, I would argue that career fulfillment is nowhere to be reached if an employee is forced to work under unsatisfying conditions. Take graduates majoring in botany for example. They would prefer wandering around the world and making discoveries instead of a stable job. Moreover, people should be given opportunities to choose their preferred destination because, by only that, they can reach their highest potential in their careers. As a result, I believe that setting such compulsory rules is good for neither nations nor professionals.
In conclusion, both arguments have their own merits. Although the employees will not feel content at their jobs, governments also cannot lose bright and young people. On balance, I think graduates should be made to work in the country where they are trained only for a certain period instead of long years.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated from coal 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive development 78
- In many countries people are living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short time and thrown away What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 79
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e set free to work wherever they wish. On one side of the argument, some people...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries in return for the study grants. However, I would argue that career fulfi...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for neither nations nor professionals. In conclusion, both arguments have their...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... certain period instead of long years.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37010676157 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86316128288 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7270589821 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433071528916 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123478337575 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119503823326 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274769399475 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142507500485 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.