In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Name: Shrey K. Naik
Topic: Issue Task #124
The given prompt states that it should be required for the leaders of any field, may it be business, politics, education or government, to step down from power after serving for five years. This may sound plausible at a first glance, however, there are certain compelling reasons for disagreeing with the statement. Hence, after considering the scenarios in the following paragraphs, it can be disagreed upon that the leaders should step down after five years.
There are numerous such policies that are expected to have a long-term outcome. The policies of the government, as an example, require a considerable amount of time before their outcomes are visible to the people. For example, the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, was elected in 2014 to serve the country. Since then, he has started many programs such as Swachch Bharat (Clean India Mission), and the GST tax policy. These programs initially had no significant outcomes but as time progressed, India became cleaner and the GST policy made life easy for many people. This happened because the policies were allowed to run and not stopped, because Modi was re-elected in 2019. Thus, in order to fulfill long-term goals, a leader has to be in power for a longer period of time.
The prompt states that a leader should step down after 5 years. Even if it were mandatory to serve only a small amount of time, five years is too small to make a change. For instance, in the case of business, a CEO has to first analyze the market, the current situation of the company and make necessary decision in order to shape a company’s future. For example, the CEO of Apple, Tim Cook, after coming into power first did all the market research and devised appropriate strategies to conquer the market. His success would not be so great if he were to serve only for a time of five years.
However, the limit of five years can help a lot to prevent corruption and the misuse of power. It allows a country to remain truly democratic. It is usually seen that corruption gets deeply ingrained in many of the leaders who remain in power for a long period of time. As an example, there are many such countries like China where the person in power has eradicated all of his competitors. This misuse of power can harm the country and its citizens. An example of peaceful transition of power is Nelson Mandela, who himself stepped down after serving his country for five years. This is very important for a democracy.
Summing up all of the above points, it becomes clear that while there are some benefits for imposing a time limit to remain in power such as preventing misuse and corruption, the benefits are not that significant when the serious disadvantages are considered. If this limit were to be imposed, the long-term goals that a leader plans out may suffer a lot and due to the very small limit, that is five years, any organization won’t be able to make a significant amount of progress. Therefore, it can be disagreed upon that leaders should step down after remaining in power for five years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | jenas | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | Mirza Raquib | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | swetha_14r | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | userxyz110 | 58 | view |
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East M 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 54
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 50
- In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 58
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: AS_TIME_PROGRESSED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as time passed'?
Suggestion: as time passed
...itially had no significant outcomes but as time progressed, India became cleaner and the GST polic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 765, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... leader has to be in power for a longer period of time. The prompt states that a leader shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... leaders who remain in power for a long period of time. As an example, there are many such cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 13, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...important for a democracy. Summing up all of the above points, it becomes clear that whi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2570.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 540.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75925925926 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53230093215 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464814814815 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 813.6 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2282436558 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8461538462 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217164310853 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649369687356 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630488868252 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116146223359 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770888963099 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.