More and more people are working from home and telecommuting with their offices. Is this a positive trend?
It is axiomatic that when a workforce group works in the workplace, problems associated with not being at home and commuting to work can affect their lives and society. In general, human beings have always been entertaining the idea of inventing something to facilitate remote communication. By considering this, it is clear that the foundation of teleworking has been established in recent decades, and people are more inclined to use it. In this regard, I firmly believe that this is a positive trend, and I will express my views on what follows.
First, when people telecommute to their offices and do not commute to work, it leads to less traffic, a severe problem that most metropolises often struggle with. It is well-known that big cities are expanding, and trade is growing proportionately. Undoubtedly, finding a practical solution to traffic congestion and all the issues surrounding it requires careful planning. Some activities have to be done at work and can never be done at home. Under such a circumstance, it can be concluded that commuting is inevitable in some cases. In this way, the government should provide a comfortable home-based environment for other jobs. Should all working people be present at work every day, air pollution would increase to the point that many people would suffer from chronic respiratory diseases. The point is that the desire to work from home can play a vital role in improving environmental conditions and bringing more meaningful content.
Second, by staying home during the day, family members can help each other in different ways and take advantage of their time. As is evident to anyone, in today's hectic world with the ever-increasing rate of inflation, specifically in my country, men and women have to work to make ends meet. Otherwise, the household head must carry on the burden of living alone and work hard to pay for the house. When people work from home, a family father, for example, can give a hand to his wife in some tasks such as care for children. As a result, they do not need to hire a babysitter or spend much time nursing children. As such, they can not only save money every month but also live in greater affluence while the man's wife has a part-time job. Besides, even if they entrust the children's care to someone else, the woman does not have enough peace of mind to focus on work. On this account, her productivity decreases, and she will not be successful enough in her career. This means that working from home enables family members to be more prosperous and never face dire financial strait.
In conclusion, teleworking from home seems to affect society positively. This is because there will be less traffic congestion in big cities. Another reason is that parents may be involved in caring for children so that both can keep their jobs.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Spending a lot of time watching sports on TV and following their favorite team will have a negative impact on one s life 60
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 70
- Universities should spend more money in improving facilities like libraries and computer labs rather than hiring famous teachers 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents must have strict rules to help their children to be successful Please use specific details and examples in your answer 76
- Some people believe that it is good idea for the athletes and entertainers to go into politics while others think that professional athletes and entertainers should not become politicians Which do you agree with and why 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will express my views on what follows. First, when people telecommute to their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75473077934 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9791594278 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351915972473 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827661252062 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755106622379 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211443206686 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728818531294 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.