The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets, divided by category
The static pie chart demonstrates the amount of time people spend on electric devices such as smartphones and tablets divide in several category including games, social networking, news, etc.
Games have the highest percent and social networking comes second on both types of device. The least time spent on mobile phones is spent reading news, while the least time spent on tablets is spent using utilities.
The majority of time spent on the two electric devices contributes to gaming with smartphones at 35% and tablets accounting for half of the pie at 57%. The majority of both platforms, on smartphones, are news and utilities, each with 3%. The figure of music and video on smartphones and other on tablets are similar at about 8%. As far as most categories are concerned, the percentage hasn't differentiated much between the two types of devices. However, with the exception of utilities, they spend almost 7 times as much time on smartphones as on tablets at 20% and spend nearly double the time on social networking on phones as on tablets in the same category.
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 67
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 61
- People can eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas As a result people eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun category seems to be countable; consider using: 'several categories'.
Suggestion: several categories
...ch as smartphones and tablets divide in several category including games, social networking, new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... accounting for half of the pie at 57%. The majority of both platforms, on smartpho...
^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., are news and utilities, each with 3%. The figure of music and video on smartphone...
^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ategories are concerned, the percentage hasnt differentiated much between the two typ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ween the two types of devices. However, with the exception of utilities, they spend almost 7 times as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95580110497 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71540076238 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519337016575 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0753459021 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305961870004 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122625428385 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120221334866 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224170144441 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123787467112 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.