The significance of human population growth, agriculture and pesticides in the decline of birds population.
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss about the probable reasons regarding decline of bird's population. The reading passage asserts that human population growth, agricultural lands and pesticides play a significant role in the decline. But the professor in the lecture refutes all of the points for the following three reasons.
First of all, the passage asserts that the growth of human population is engendering the decline of bird's habitats. The human population growth necessitates to build more homes, offices and malls. These will in turn affect greatly in the bird's habitats. But the professor in the lecture opposes this point as she thinks that the human population growth is not the reason in decline of bird's population size in general. There might be some kinds of birds that are in danger but some other kinds of birds might thrive as a result of large human population, for example, pigeons, hawks, seagulls, landfills etc. That's why human population growth can't be a cause for the decline.
Second of all, the passage says that more agricultural lands are needed recently to produce crops. These necessitates to use the bird's habitats as the crop's land. This in turn, reduces the bird's population. But the lecture opposes this reason as it thinks that recently there are some new approaches to produce crops in lesser lands. This won't necessitates to replace the bird's habitats. This recent innovation of growing crops in lesser land refutes the claim of the passage.
Finally, the passage says that there are pesticides that are needed to implement in agricultural lands. This pesticides can kill the pests and contaminate the waters. The birds can be affected by these pesticides through drinking that contaminated water and feeding those pests. In turn, they will die if not it will affect their reproduction system. But the professor in the lecture refutes this as she thinks that today some pesticides are being invented that are less toxic. Moreover, a new approach that pest resistant crops are being introduced that can lessen the use of pesticides. That's why pesticides can't be an issue regarding the decline of birds in future.
- Online encyclopedia and printed encyclopedia
- People benefit more from travelling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries 70
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 66
- Avenues that are proposed in the reading passage to control cane toad population in Australia are rejected by the professor in the lecture 71
- The significance of human population growth agriculture and pesticides in the decline of birds population 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture both...
^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ut the professor in the lecture refutes all of the points for the following three reasons....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts for the following three reasons. First of all, the passage asserts that t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...igeons, hawks, seagulls, landfills etc. Thats why human population growth cant be a c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... etc. Thats why human population growth cant be a cause for the decline. S...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rowth cant be a cause for the decline. Second of all, the passage says that...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...e crops land. This in turn, reduces the birds population. But the lecture opposes thi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd refutes the claim of the passage. Finally, the passage says that there are...
^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ded to implement in agricultural lands. This pesticides can kill the pests and conta...
^^^^
Line 7, column 594, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... that can lessen the use of pesticides. Thats why pesticides cant be an issue regardi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 615, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...use of pesticides. Thats why pesticides cant be an issue regarding the decline of bi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 663, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...an issue regarding the decline of birds in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, for example, in general, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1095505618 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60792029482 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421348314607 0.540411800872 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7299617309 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6818181818 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413968993087 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123445486627 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133760891511 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249400785579 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153359317968 0.0443174109184 346% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.