Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
In recent years, limited participation in physical activities and creativity by children non-stop engaging in television has never failed to draw public attention and spark controversies. In this essay, the reasons behind this phenomenon will be discussed, along with potential solutions to it.
There are two elements that contribute to children being addicted to television. The first one is the lack of parental attention when children are left with their televisions without any guidance or limits set by their parents. This is due to the fact that parents have neglected the damage of excessive television consumption. As a result, children may end up feeling exhausted which is caused by spending time on television for hours, along with children neglecting other physical and creative activities such as playing sports, doing homework, and socializing with friends.
Furthermore, another reason that should be taken into account is all-day broadcasting programs with addictive content such as colorful animated movies, or attention-appealing advertisements. This is exemplified by children being targeted by many program creators, owing to the fact that children own unlimited interests and tender personalities, which greatly contributes to the major group of increasing views of television programs. Therefore, the alternatives to other activities can be influenced by the level of television addiction of children.
Two solutions of great practicality are suggested to alleviate the situation. To begin with, parents should take an active role in managing their children’s television consumption. To be more specific, parents can set limits on screen time, monitor contents that their children may encounter, and encourage them to participate in other activities that promote healthy development. By taking these steps, parents can help their children avoid the negative consequences of excessive television consumption.
In conclusion, the lack of parents' attention and all-day broadcasting programs with addictive content are the key reasons that account for the problem. With the solutions mentioned above, there are a number of ways that could be done to counteract the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | an@123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Ng Minh Chau | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Nguyenx Trần Minh Trí | view |
- The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 67
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creativ 78
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75153374233 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16940050358 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555214723926 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9940737489 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263587503558 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906307788599 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585051763176 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14401324175 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634825857142 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.