Atomic energy is becoming more and more popular energy source. However, some people argue that nuclear power puts life on Earth to danger. What is your opinion?
Despite the increasing popularity of atomic energy, there is an agreement among several individuals on its prohibition due to threat it poses on the Earth. Although this sort of energy can be detrimental to human lives to a certain extent, the advantages are of greater significance.
One the one hand, opponents of nuclear energy emphasize the adverse nuclear explosions. Acknowledging the fatal impact of nuclear weapons, some individuals indulged in dubious activities related to producing atomic bombs during wartime. A prime example of this is the two atomic bombs the United States detonated over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed millions of people. From this perspective, these disasters are likely to reoccur if humans continue to harness atomic energy.
On the other hand, despite the above-mentioned disadvantage, nuclear energy has a positive impact on environmental preservation, which justifies the promotion of vehicles powered by nuclear energy. Contrary to what many believe, cooling towers in nuclear plants only emit water vapor, and are thus, not releasing any pollutant or radioactive substance into the atmosphere. Many nuclear energy proponents also argue that nuclear power is a catalyst for the fastest decarbonization effort in history with big nuclear players like France, Canada and South Korea being among the countries that recorded the fastest decline in carbon intensity and experienced a clean energy transition by building nuclear reactors and hydro electric dams. Another point worth considering is that it is much safer than fossil fuels from a public health aspect. Burning oil and coal can escalate climate change and release pollutants that lead to multiple health issues, including cancer, heart disease and premature death. Conversely, in nearly 70 years since the beginning of nuclear power, only three accidents have raised public concerns with one directly causing deaths.
In conclusion, nuclear power can be a highly destructive weapon, but the risk of a nuclear catastrophe are relatively low. It is advisable for the authorities to provide funding for nuclear reactors to produce electricity without any gas emission.
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many people believe that charity organizations should give aid to those in greatest need wherever they live Others believe that charity organizations should concentrate on people who live in their own countries Discuss and give your own opinion 84
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 78
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, thus, in conclusion, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55223880597 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88141508761 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0017936611 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207885282647 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641310735253 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472447497087 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114914720512 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303353454255 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.