In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and this may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
It is true that in some parts of the world, small town-center stores are likely bankrupted as a result of increasingly people going to large out-of-town ones. This limits the access of people who don’t have cars to out-of-town stores, leading to a rise of car use. In my view, this trend has more benefits than drawbacks.
Closure of small town-center shops puts people into an inconvenient situation, especially those who rely on public transportation or live nearby because they have to travel to a distant place to shop. As a result, the use of cars also increases, leading to the high volume of traffic and some other problems such as traffic jams or bumper-to-bumper traffic on the road. This also causes the high level of carbon emission which severely contaminates the air.
However, more and more people going to the out-of-town stores leads to the high demand of stores outside the town which has lots of benefits. This provides more employment opportunities for local residents and then boosts the economy of this place as well. Moreover, this can help to reduce the flux of people moving to the city centre for seeking a job, contributing to the balanced population density.
In conclusion, while I accept that the bankruptcy of small town-center shops and the increasing number of people going out of the town for shopping causes several drawbacks in terms of individuals or environments, I still believe that the benefits of this trend are much more considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a salmon 61
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them 78
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and this may result in an increase in the use of cars Do 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98387096774 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86328938786 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560483870968 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2979608144 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489014708294 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182398579852 0.084324248473 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153351971604 0.0667982634062 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304094173703 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142664136882 0.056905535591 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.