The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar charts show information on the proportion of Australia's native citizens and migrators living in cities, rural and town from 1995 to 2010.
Overall, in a period of 15 years, the total amount of people living in town and rural areas from two groups of citizens decreased while there was a surge in Australia’s city dwellers, which ranked first of citizens among 3 areas.
Considering native people in Australia, in 1995, the percentage of people living in cities was the highest with nearly 50% before it surpassed 60% in 2010. Despite a rise in city dwellers, the proportion of people living in rural areas dropped from over 30% (1995) to under 20% (2010). The percentage of Australia’s town citizens also decreased slightly in 15 years.
In terms of migrators to Australia, the ratio of people living in cities soared from 60% to 80% in 15 years. However, at the same time, the percentage of rural citizens fell nearly tenfold from 40% to approximately 10%. Moreover, there were slightly fewer people residing in town in 2010 compared to in 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | reverjae | 78 | view |
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 78
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 61
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66421183305 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7576809051 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253448100344 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132969092222 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504570732643 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17883947684 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468733957323 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.