The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line graph compares the percentage of people aged 65 or more in three countries over a period of 100 years.
It is clear that the proportion of elderly people increases in each country between 1940 and 2040. Japan is expected to see the most dramatic changes in its elderly population.
In 1940, around 9% of Americans were aged 65 or over, compared to about 7% of Swedish people and 5% of Japanese people. The proportions of elderly people in the USA and Sweden rose gradually over the next 50 years, reaching just under 15% in 1990. By contrast, the figures for Japan remained below 5% until the early 2000s.
Looking into the future, a sudden increase in the percentage of elderly people is predicted for Japan, with a jump of over 15% in just 10 years from 2030 to 2040. By 2040, it is thought that around 27% of the Japanese population will be 65 years old or more, while the figures for Sweden and the USA will be slightly lower, at about 25% and 23% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | nguyenhnil | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below
- Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land Which solution is better 67
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 67
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 56
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main energy source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power or wind power To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49438202247 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41975103081 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5292096986 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290578026181 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123184326338 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980559847191 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180540251197 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624150721165 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.