The graphs below show three exports from South East Asia and the four sources of revenue for 1970 and 1995. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given below.
The graph illustrates that the three types of exports like Manufactured production, Timber and other raw products. The pie represents the revenue of South East Asia in 1970 and in 1995 By tourism, exports, Domestic and others.
The line graph shows that the exports in millions of US dollars over the period of 25 years from 1970 to 1995. The manufactured products starting from 20 million and increased gradually since 1970 and then stabilize till 1980 and reach the highest point by increases sharply and decline with the same pace and then increased steadily. Timber exports starting from 30 million and then rose instantly and then decreased over all with fluctuation and stable in 20 million from 1990 to 1995. Other raw products start from lowest point, 12.5 million and incline up to 25 million and then stabilize till 1985 and falls accordingly until 1995.
The pie chart reveals the percentage revenue for South East Asia 1970, the revenue of Domestic, Exports and Tourism is around similar like 33%, 29% and 27% respectively and other revenue is 11%. The sources revenue for south Asia in 1995 comparison of 1975, the revenue generated from tourism is almost doubled by 54%, whereas exports revenue decline by around 50% from 29% to 12%, the generated revenue from domestic decline by 11% and the other products revenue is remained same almost around 13%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-08 | Mubashir123 | 67 | view |
| 2018-01-29 | Parkourrahman | 90 | view |
| 2018-01-29 | Dewi | 92 | view |
| 2018-01-29 | ananbahrulkhoir | 88 | view |
- The graphs below show three exports from South East Asia and the four sources of revenue for 1970 and 1995 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given below 67
- Writing Task 1 at least 150 words The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ourism, exports, Domestic and others. The line graph shows that the exports in mi...
^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e period of 25 years from 1970 to 1995. The manufactured products starting from 20 ...
^^^
Line 2, column 514, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'from the lowest'.
Suggestion: from the lowest
... 1990 to 1995. Other raw products start from lowest point, 12.5 million and incline up to 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sources'' or 'source's'?
Suggestion: sources'; source's
...pectively and other revenue is 11%. The sources revenue for south Asia in 1995 comparis...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...m domestic decline by 11% and the other products revenue is remained same almost around ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98253275109 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41317645563 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475982532751 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6042451413 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.625 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277487517233 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134264851245 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755013918909 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195326887772 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645327034929 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.