Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The significance of health, education and commerce which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. However, the growth of undeveloped countries in several Sectors such as treatment, study and business which are the most crucial part when the authorities of developed nations should play a role for donating those places. In my opinion, the idea of assisting to poor nations by others which is more logical. This essay will explain attributing to this trend along with examples in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with most of the states which are unprivileged are unable to achieve goals in health, educational and economic due to the shortage of findings. Moreover, governments of upgrade areas provide money for growing sectors in another countries, individuals will receive a vast number of opportunities to live a standard lifestyle. For instance, many European kingdoms assisted Bangladesh during war in 1971 when population survived numerous drawbacks as loose properties. Thus, it is clear that, why rich executives raise hand for helping to poor countries.
On the other hand, if people from underdeveloped states get sufficient funds, they will succeed in career in several sectors through learning in colleges. Furthermore, medical colleges make doctors to treat individuals with free of cast along with graduates can manage jobs as teachers and professionals to increase educational rates as well as economically. For example, some middle east authorities create universities in Bangladesh for freshers who want to study in engineering, medical and others subjects. Hence, every rich nation should provide money to develop poor nations.
To sum up according to the arguments one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of health, education and business are instrumental indeed. However, to improve all nations every rich country should donate other underdeveloped cities
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | nijam | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Guiseppe59192 | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Guri473812 | 61 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- water is a natural resource that should always be free Governments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 67
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree w 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54125412541 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97389221367 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623762376238 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9436211735 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6428571429 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214342227891 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707068247197 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497212197108 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127893561847 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200506135716 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.