The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar chart illustrates the number of US household, categorized by their yearly earnings in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apperent readily that household income less than $50.000 showed an initial increase, followed by a slight decrease across 8 years. In contrast, household with earnings exceeding $75.000 witnessed a small decline before rebounding, with those making $75.000 to $99.999 a year consistenly having the lowest figure. At the same time, household with mid-level incomes remained stable. Noticeably, the group that earns $100.000 yearly is the largest group compares to the others over the time period shown.
Starting with household incomes below $50.000, 25 million had an annual income less than $25.000 intinially, after which it had risen to about 30 million in 2011 and falling marginally to around 27 million in the final year. Household who made beetwen $25.000 and $49.000 yearly mirrored this trend, albeit at a high rate , starting at approximately 26 million, peaking at exactly 30 million then ending at around 29 million in 2015.
In terms of houshold with annual earnings of above $75.000, there were nearly 15 million earning $75.000 to $99.000 in 2007, but it later climbed to precisely 15 million in the end of the timeframe. Similar changes, but to a much greater extent, were observed in the figure of household with the largest income range , growing from just under 30 million to roughly 33 million despite the negligible drop in 2011. Meanwhile, household with the income range $50.000 to $74.999 were the only one category that witnessed no remarkable points, its figure stay unchanged at just over 20 million throughout the period.
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 84
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The bar chart provides data about average weekly income spending by families in one particular country in two years Overall food had a higher rate in 1968 Meanwhile in 2018 families spending more money on housing and leisure fuel energy was the lowest In 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rrored this trend, albeit at a high rate , starting at approximately 26 million, p...
^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... household with the largest income range , growing from just under 30 million to r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1119133574 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5585574069 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 106.607317073 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9681807184 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.6 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149900997126 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078055629276 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079309949041 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13418088624 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962475692991 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.