Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
With the technological advancements, space exploration has been of worldwide concern, which is believed to be promising to operate in the near future. I contend that while there are potential financial burdens for individuals or corporations to handle, the merits of outer space tourism relating the human habitation in extraterrestrial planets and experiments on various conditions for life are worth investing in.
Granted, space travel financially demands for divergent stages of beforehand developments. Before launching a spaceship or having the ability to travel with hordes of numerous tourists, research needs to be conducted on Earth. This requires a great deal of monetary support for preparation, experiment, and trials. Without these processes, the fundamental requirement for space tourism, the spaceship, would not be manufactured, not to say properly operate. Take the SpaceX’s experimented rocket for example, before its first successful launch, Elon Musk had invested almost 2 billion dollars for the mechanical preparations and testing stages. Consequently, not until countless trials and errors did the rocket operate properly and make its first outer space exploration.
Despite the financial trouble that space travel may get into, there are irrefutable advantages of this promising phenomenon. Proponents of the potential of outer space tourism maintain that it is inevitable given the increased need for human living areas. The world’s population has risen to the point that almost few residential places are available for human’s demand for housing. This, outer space travel, results in the exploration of habitable planets, allowing human to relocate in the future. Another positive impact is it can assist in further astronomical exploration. Not only does the world concern more about astronomy learning, but there has also been an elevated curiosity for extraterrestrial investigation. Therefore, having space tourism in the near distant will allow in-depth understanding of the universe outside the Earth.
In conclusion, I acknowledge the exceptional financial pool of space travel; however, I posit that there are more benefits relating to this anticipation including the possibility for outer space habitation and deeper astronomical research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | nhung3012 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-08 | Albert Armin | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | Nguyenkhanh7705 | 73 | view |
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...worldwide concern, which is believed to be promising to operate in the near future. I conten...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82686567164 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16180423409 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0356614491 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25323528657 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871272759785 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441922077275 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170097389279 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00978390783381 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.