The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in its young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the greatest method the next generation preparation is to centralize more resources on the young. I partly agree with this statement because the sustainable development of a country depends on both human resources and others.
It is an unignorable fact that growing the young is a fundamental solution for the next generation. Firstly, the human resource is the most precious asset which is owned by ambitious countries. Almost areas activities these days have high demands of prevalent participants in order to meet the new challenges in new norms. This results from significant education systems of these countries spending their budgets to cultivate the young. Additionally, investing in the people allows countries to harvest more stable achievements in long run stages. For example, the greatest leader of Vietnam said: “for the sake of 10 years, we must plant trees; for the sake of 100 years, we must cultivate people”. This is an ironic positive advice which any country could implement in their long - term development strategies. These are several reasons for my agreement on investing in the young by crucial resources of a country.
However, the prospect of a country not only depends on its citizens but also on its technology development science. To be more specified, the future growth should be contributed by burning cutting edge technology in using and exploiting natural resource friendly environmentally. Therefore, budgeting on advance technology to generate reusable resources such as sustainable energies (including wind powers or solar farms) and eco-friendly material allows countries to remain sustainability. A reason for creating high tech solution is that people could reduce natural resources such as fossil energy (gas, oil, coal and so forth). This makes the environment of the earth reasonable and releases the greenhouse effect. As a result, the future growth must be meaningful to human beings if there are high quality of life were satisfied and upgraded by time.
In conclusion, although centralizing more resources to the young for planning long run prospects, other factors still could be paid more attention by authorities simultaneously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | MinhGoal1 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen a pencil or brush What are the reasons for this Is the decline in writing by hand a positive or negative development 84
- It was predicted that people living in the twenty first century would have more free time than ever before because of improvements in technology To what extent has this prediction come true 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45481049563 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01663939457 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588921282799 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0239331656 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.058823529 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315492783786 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921319188472 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617886608541 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187729957756 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358269294458 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.