Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there are various foods and drinks that have the high amount of sugar than standard and that may cause health issues in the future. Some people believe that we should manufacture sugary products with higher costs to prevent people from consume them too much, I personally disagree with the idea.
On the one hand, it is not reasonable to make people pay more for a product that does not have added values. The price of a product are based on its value so when products like food or drink that contain high level of sugar do not bring more values to customers, this only is beneficial for stores. It may result in more and more places where sell unhealthy products will appear. For example, when the prices of fast-food increase without the rise in materials, there are more stores that are opened to sell them and it can have more people consume these products.
On the other hand, there are more effective methods to encourage people to consume less sugar. Firstly, governments can introduce some regulations to force manufacturers to produce less sugar products and they will subsidize for them. By this way, people will be able to have more healthy choices with the reasonable prices. Secondly, it is likely to be better when people are aware the drawbacks of junk foods and actively avoid eating them. When people understand the negative impacts of sugary products on their health, they will decide not to consume them without any forces. Finally, we should look for another products to replace for sugary products and this will have a positive impact in the long run.
In conclusion, while some people argue that products that contain high levels of sugar should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar, I believe that this is not reasonable and there are various ways to help people to eat more healthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 67
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ays to help people to eat more healthy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81761006289 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30551832314 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496855345912 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.449381313 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.846153846 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430920422134 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163038285003 0.084324248473 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892884169741 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299495239657 0.151304729494 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623565273305 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.