"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."
Do we learn much more from those people whose idea is common with us than from people whose ideas are opposite ours own? The speaker daims so, disagreement causes stress and and prohibite learning. I concede that undue dispute hamper counterproductive of learning. However, I mostly disagree with the speaker’s claim as well as in my point of view we learn much more from those people whose ideas contradicts our own than from those people whose idea is similar with us.
Firstly, opposite idea helps us to save people from precarious situations. For supporting examples one need look no further than drug productions system. Posit that, a particular component is used for producing the particular diseases. Recent researchers find that that component which is used for making the drug of particular causes cancer in future. This is completely opposite claims. If they proof themselves with evidence, it will save civilizations from critical damage.
Secondly, disagreement helps to find the logical thinking gap. For example, in a debate if the two teams are in sense of neutral thinking stages, they both consider the opposite logic about the fact and acknoledge the gap of their own, which help to find their thinking gap in their study or fact. Indeed, disagreement shows what are lackings own with respect to opposite, whether the opposite’s logic is acceptable. In fact, it helps not only broadening thinking stradegy but also help to consider in neutral sense.
On the contrary, under some circumstances we see countereffect of the foregoing two provisos. For instance, in a television political debate where each one try to show it’s supremacy to others and they become dogmatic till the last in the dispute. Admitedly, if they are not in neutral sense of consideration of true fact, it will deterent of learning. On the other hand, if they are in neutral sense and condider the logical fact of each statement, it will help widening knowledge.
To sum up, unless the persons are in neutal sense in consideration of the logic of fact it causes hindrence to learning, otherwise, in broad sense disagreement helps to broaden our knowledge and help to find our gap.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | MEHUL DESAI | 66 | view |
- some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively 66
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively 66
- some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively 50
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 50
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...er daims so, disagreement causes stress and and prohibite learning. I concede that undu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s used for making the drug of particular causes cancer in future. This is complet...
^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...g the drug of particular causes cancer in future. This is completely opposite claims. If...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: TO_VB_ITS_NN[26]
Message: Did you mean 'to show its supremacy'?
Suggestion: to show its supremacy
...ion political debate where each one try to show it’s supremacy to others and they become dogmatic till...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...tical debate where each one try to show it’s supremacy to others and they become dog...
^^^^
Line 7, column 464, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to widen' or 'widen'.
Suggestion: to widen; widen
...al fact of each statement, it will help widening knowledge. To sum up, unless the per...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as, on the contrary, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82036246686 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0900035454 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3157894737 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.68421052632 5.21951772744 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269883025947 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732933161977 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13006490131 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134792608751 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176202882998 0.0667264976115 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.