3. Some people think mobile (cell) phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
With the ever-growing mobile phone usage, the idea of prohibiting the use in public places has sparked a heated debate. Many people believe that there should be a complete ban on phone utilization in outdoors or public areas. I firmly disagree with this approach as it is impractical and unrealistic.
To begin with, mobile phone is now an inevitable gadget and is used for enormous other activities other than attending phone call only. Posing a complete stop on using the cell phones would create a chaos as many people use it for navigation, communication and for emergency purposes. Instead of that, a balanced approach can be opted such as introduction of polices pertinent to reasonable usage in outdoors.
Furthermore, it is completely understandable that many people uses the mobile phone inappropriately. For instance playing loud music or conversing loudly in public creates inconvenience for surrounding people. However, complete restriction cannot be possibly implemented because of the internet usage over mobile phones. Everyone nowadays greatly reply on the internet and the prime source is the cell phone. Nonetheless, The government can introduce detailed guidelines to use the phone in public places. The guidelines includes putting the phone on silent mode, using headphones while listening to music or converse on calls in the designated phone areas only.
In conclusion, It is an undeniable fact that sometimes mobile phones are a big reason for public nuisance owing to irrational usage by some people. But i would like to reiterate that complete restriction on phone would lead to discomfort for many and will cause disruptive behaviors as there are many genuine users that heavily dependent on phone. That is why it is highly recommended that instead of implementing such stringent action, a rational approach is to implement well-written phone usage guidelines and ensure people to obey the rules to prevent any hurdles in executing their day-to-day phone related activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 56 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment but population and education as well What problems will your country face in the next ten years How can th 89
- 3 Some people think mobile cell phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people But some people say that young people can also be a leader Do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'include'.
Suggestion: include
... phone in public places. The guidelines includes putting the phone on silent mode, using...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...to irrational usage by some people. But i would like to reiterate that complete r...
^
Line 4, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir day-to-day phone related activities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, nonetheless, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36825396825 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00210054957 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55873015873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8087423863 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.733333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254532438971 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969165424222 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560845112222 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182752137724 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886820308162 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'include'.
Suggestion: include
... phone in public places. The guidelines includes putting the phone on silent mode, using...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...to irrational usage by some people. But i would like to reiterate that complete r...
^
Line 4, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir day-to-day phone related activities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, nonetheless, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36825396825 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00210054957 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55873015873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8087423863 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.733333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254532438971 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969165424222 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560845112222 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182752137724 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886820308162 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.