User
1. Ambition is a positive quality for people to have in society today. How important is it for people who want to succeed in life? Is it a positive or negative characteristic?
Ambition is widely regarded as a positive quality, playing a crucial role in individuals' pursuit of success and accomplishments in contemporary society. This essay explores the significance of ambition in achieving life goals and evaluates whether it is a positive or negative characteristic.
Ambition serves as a driving force for individuals aspiring to succeed in various aspects of life. It provides the motivation needed to set and accomplish goals, fostering a sense of purpose and direction. Ambitious individuals often exhibit resilience in the face of challenges, enabling them to overcome obstacles on the path to success. Moreover, ambition encourages continuous self-improvement and learning, as individuals strive to enhance their skills and knowledge to achieve their ambitions.
The importance of ambition in personal and professional development cannot be overstated. In the professional realm, ambition propels individuals to seek career advancements, take on leadership roles, and contribute to their fields. This drive not only benefits the ambitious individuals but also has positive repercussions for the organizations and communities they engage with. Ambition is, therefore, a catalyst for innovation, progress, and societal development.
While ambition is generally positive, it is essential to consider its potential drawbacks. Excessive or misplaced ambition may lead to unethical behavior, such as cutting corners to achieve success or pursuing goals at the expense of personal relationships. Striking a balance between ambition and ethical considerations is crucial to ensure that the pursuit of success does not compromise one's integrity.
In conclusion, ambition is a vital quality for individuals striving to succeed in life. It acts as a motivator, propelling individuals towards their goals and contributing to personal and societal development. However, individuals must exercise caution to ensure that their ambition aligns with ethical standards, preventing its transformation into a negative characteristic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-07 | huyenthoai1ty | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | huyenthoai1ty | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Amna Zeeshan | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 73
- 3 Some people think mobile cell phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- 1 You and your family are planning to spend a weekend at a seaside hotel Write a letter to the hotel making the arrangements Let them know when you will be arriving and leaving what type of rooms you would like and ask them how much the weekend will cost 87
- 6 You found a piece of lost luggage with someone s belongings labeled with their name and address Write a letter to the owner In your letter describe the luggage you found explain where you found it suggest how the owner could get it back 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... pursuit of success does not compromise ones integrity. In conclusion, ambition i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04794520548 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45716760968 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571917808219 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7116592171 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196684919247 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728806111025 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071351924722 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116892236882 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455725421465 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... pursuit of success does not compromise ones integrity. In conclusion, ambition i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04794520548 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45716760968 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571917808219 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7116592171 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196684919247 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728806111025 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071351924722 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116892236882 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455725421465 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.