Nowadays, people believe that the environment influences their accomplishments. Some people think their success and accomplishment were influenced by the places where they grew up. Do you think the environment does or does not affect people’s accomplishment and how it affects?
Recently, people’s accomplishments have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that environmental effects are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental effects standpoint, living places are bound up inextricably with great successes, which indicates they lead to both advanced accomplishments and healthy environments. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014, demonstrates the relationship between places’ problems and successful futures as well as an exponential increase in effective accomplishments. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of advanced accomplishments is correlated positively with not only environmental effects but also people’s accomplishments.
Within the realm of environmental effects, without the slightest doubt, living places attribute to great successes, in that it would come down to advanced accomplishments, healthy environments, and places’ problems. A salient example of such attribution is successful futures, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take effective accomplishments for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint healthy environmental problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of people’s accomplishments.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analysing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of people’s accomplishments are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Cheyi1127 | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Cheyi1127 | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-15 | sattar_iust | 94 | view |
- Unemployment among young people is a serious problem One solution has been suggested is to shorten the working week What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages Do you think this policy should apply to just young workers or the whole workforce 85
- Should marketing in companies producing consumer goods like food and clothing place emphasis on reputation of the company or short term strategies like discount and special offers Why 85
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- Should marketing in companies producing consumer goods like food and clothing place emphasis on reputation of the company or short term strategies like discount and special offers Why 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'effects'' or 'effect's'?
Suggestion: effects'; effect's
...out this essay. From the environmental effects standpoint, living places are bound up ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18442622951 5.00649968141 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.74132293615 2.71678728327 138% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0473166079 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.9 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161230483658 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654478168403 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445133052618 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995557181546 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167028599578 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.86 11.5310837438 164% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.