As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
These days there is an ongoing discussion among people that governments should focus on building better public transport networks over roads. Although building public mode of transport rather than roads are thoroughly both positive and constructive by many individuals, a number of people hold an opposite view. I am inclined to strongly believe that governments should focus more on building public transport systems.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why I support the idea that governments should concentrate more on building public transport. First and foremost is that public transport systems are always economic for the common people. Secondly, it causes less pollution and is more environment-friendly. For instance, 20 people traveling on a bus is always efficient compared to 20 people driving their own vehicles. Consequently, it is quite conspicuous that public mode of transport is quite advantageous.
However, there is no doubt that the lack of roads can cause various negative outcomes. Roads are necessary and important for a nation’s development. But what people need is a good public transport system and not just roads. By way of example, a recent study conducted by eminent scientists has shown that 80% of the people prefer public transports over private vehicles. Thus, it is quite obvious that governments should be focusing on building a better network of public transport.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are several persuasive arguments on both sides, my opinion depicts that the governments should give more attention in building better public transport facilities over roads because it’ll benefit the nations in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 55 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
- Should marketing in companies producing consumer goods like food and clothing place emphasis on reputation of the company or short term strategies like discount and special offers Why 85
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 85
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? !f voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 77
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00321223801 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.470642103 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352488340518 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125021811425 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583988108847 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224664078166 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220713406641 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.