In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people.
Why might this be the case?
Do you think this is a positive or a negative situation?
In some countries, people desire to have their own home instead of living in rented houses. There are a number of reasons for the increasing desire to own a home, but I think this trend causes many disadvantages.
It is understandable why people in some countries want to buy a house rather than rent. Many people are more materialistic and home ownership is a criterion to measure their economic status. They believe that only people who cannot afford to buy a place to live should rent a place to live, and that having a home brings an atmosphere of respectability. In addition, owning a home brings a sense of security. If renting, the landlord may end the lease without notice, or the tenant may have difficulty paying the rent during certain periods of financial hardship. Ultimately, I think this could be a wise and profitable investment because real estate is a profitable business.
However, I think development will bring negative impacts. Young people in these countries experience more financial stress when buying a home. An example is the fact that owning a house in a densely populated area requires a lot of money and most young people need loans to own a house. This can become a factor that hinders work-life balance because they have to work hard to pay off debt plus property taxes and insurance proportional to the size of the house as well as expenses. Electricity and maintenance are added to their daily expenses. If they want to save money, they often choose to buy a house far from the city center, making traveling between home and work more inconvenient than renting an apartment in the center for the same price.
In short, I can attribute the desire to own a house instead of renting to the materialism of young people, the desire for a stable living condition and long-term investment. However, I think this trend also puts more financial burden on young people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | tran quynh | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | tran quynh | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | tran quynh | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | atharva35 | 56 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish 89
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, i think, in addition, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80733944954 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73810136336 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3579702241 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282703773732 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959344653411 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656119069458 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184242825355 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579076683613 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.