the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates how products were transported by four kinds of transportations in the United Kingdom from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, there was an increase in the number of transportations including road, water, and pipeline, with road transporting witnessing the most dramatic rise. The number of goods transported by road and pipeline were the largest and lowest figures throughout the period.
The road’s number started at approximately 70 million tonnes in 1974, after which it experienced an unsteadily increase before ending the period at shy of 100 million tonnes in 2002. Similar changes, but to lesser extents, were seen in the figures for water and pipeline, which fluctuated from just under 40 million tonnes to north of 60 million tonnes and from roughly 5 million tonnes to upward of 20 million tonnes in a period of 28 years respectively.
The figure for products transported by rail was at precisely 40 million tonnes, with a subsequent fluctuation in the range from about 25 million tonnes to 35 tonnes relatively, and a final increase to just over 40 million tonnes was witnessed at the end of the period examined. Despite growing gradually, the pipeline’s number of products transported was still at the bottom of the four kinds of transportation throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | cookie12 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | taocute.s1 | 74 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Roy An | 11 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table show how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('unsteadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...nes in 1974, after which it experienced an unsteadily increase before ending the period at shy of 100 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18571428571 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00667813021 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6507609566 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.571428571 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115115519965 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860890171838 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665812545416 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107247850332 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699139660513 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.