More people put their personal information online (address, telephone number…) for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
One of the most common occurrences in digital world is the availability of personal information online for daily activities, such as social networking or banking. Despite some advantages, I opine that this development is largely detrimental.
On the one hand, the presence of personal data online produces certain values. Regarding services, it enhances customers’ experience by making signing up accounts more convenient for users and expediting the linking process among online applications. To illustrate, to register a stock account, investors do not have to go to stock companies and complete lots of paperwork like in the past but can process online. As their identity information on exchange app is synchronized and linked with their banking accounts, trading activities can be conducted online and transaction history is sent to email for recording. Moreover, by providing online contacts, people can get notified of news they want to be updated. For instance, job seekers can leave their email addresses on LinkedIn and filter out all kinds of jobs they demand so that any new hiring information will be sent to their emails.
However, I believe that this is a negative tendency because of potential severe risks associated with it. For one, the private information shared online can be exploited for illicit purposes such as financial fraud. For example, a hacker known as “Hieu PC” stole thousands of social security numbers of American workers and then resold them on an anonymous broker’s online platform to earn money. Secondly, when users provide their information to social media companies, online shops, or banks, there is still a slight chance that these companies will sell it to telesales people or even malicious parties. Consequently, people would be bothered by anonymous calls to sell products and services or even deceptive calls. A typical example is cases when bad guys pretend to be relatives and call to borrow money.
In conclusion, despite undeniable benefits, I reckon putting up private details online is a negative development. It is therefore necessary to be cognizant of the risks associated with this decision, and even more so to take steps to protect oneself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-18 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-24 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-24 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | gobidea | 89 | view |
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33142857143 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88795386927 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608571428571 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1023491239 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305346842716 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835896397502 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620294880581 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167424220022 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518340327324 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.