The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the changes that have taken place in the consumption of three different kinds of nutrients, including sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar, in typical meals.
Overall, while the average percentage of sodium and saturated fat was the largest at dinner, snacks were observed as the time that people digested added sugar the most. Additionally, the figures for these nutrients were not high in the morning.
Regarding sodium, nearly 50% of this nutrient was consumed when people had dinner, but only 29% at lunch, followed by 14% at breakfast and snacks. Turning to saturated fat, it can be seen that 37% of this nutritious element was provided in food at dinner, 21% for snacks, 26% for lunch, and only 16% for breakfast.
Looking at the consumption of added sugar, a large proportion of extra sugar was experienced through types of snacks, at 42%, nearly doubling the figure at dinner. However, breakfast and lunch witnessed more modest figures when providing food including this chemical nutrient, with just 16% and 19% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 84
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1676300578 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62981006265 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630057803468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0614764415 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0599906580153 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323974226771 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0174710838416 0.0843802449381 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0436755205329 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188754165036 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.