The pie and bar charts below show the percentage of water consumption and use in Australia in 2004.
The pie chart demonstrates the changes that have taken place in the water consumption of various types of consumers in 2004, while the bar chart illustrates how the water was used by residents in that nation.
Overall, residential areas had the highest percentage of using water compared with other groups, including industrial regions, businesses, the government, and others, and most of them consumed water for taking care of their gardens.
Regarding the consumers, 70% of water was consumed by people coming from residential areas, making it the most water-consumed region, followed by 11% by industries and 10% by businesses. Subsequently, the figures from the government and other groups were not as significant as that of residential places, at 6% and 3% respectively.
Going deeper into residential water use, nearly 30% of water was used for gardens and bathrooms, which was roughly three times larger than the percentage of kitchens. Finally, people in these regions utilized 20% of water for washing clothes and 15% for toilet purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | dinhthu05 | 63 | view |
- The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- An increasing number of people are choosing plastic surgery Why do people want to change the way they look Is this a positive or negative development 67
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34337349398 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92118987205 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1600785367 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.833333333 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27231886841 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127434457036 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119746090129 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172327045991 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117255447658 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.