The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate the development which has occurred in a science area from 2008 to these days.
Overall, the examined park has witnessed a significant transformation with the addition of various buildings, and the improvement of the traffic system, serving citizens' demands.
Regarding buildings in the park, to the north of this park, the grassland of the northwest corner has been transformed into research and development. Next to it, the area of woodland, the offices and the business units have still remained unchanged, while it has seen a replacement of the reception by the university hub. Moreover, the cycle paths have been constructed beside the road not only in the northeast but also in the middle of the map. Another noticeable point is that the car park which was located in the center of the park has remained untouched over numerous years.
Turning into the south of the map, the woodland in the southwest corner, and that one along with the road near the cyber security have not been changed. Furthermore, this park has witnessed an emergence of an IT center in place of Innovation center, while the cyber security has been extended to the north. The last one is the addition of the station in the bottom of the map, and the bus stop below the cycle path in the east.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-26 | Lethanh54 | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-25 | Lethanh54 | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be What are the causes What can be done to improve the situation 84
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 78
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 73
- The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82959641256 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65886385491 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.1281988111 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160045843292 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652522277717 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410110487187 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929095178606 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261552885624 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.