In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Driverless car technology is being developed rapidly, so in the future all cars, buses and trucks will run automatically. Although driverless car can create some dangers but its modernity and usefulness to human bring more benefits than drawbacks.
Many people think driveless vehicles wil create dangers in traffic. For example, They are concerned about the safety of non-driving car, they think it can get trouble in machines and loss of control when the car drive automatically then cause accidents. Some others think that driverless vehicles can replace taxi drivers or buses drivers, thereby causing job loss for many people. As a result, many people think that driverless vehicles have disadvantages.
On the other hand, many people support vehicles without drivers because of its convenience. They think that the errors are very rare, on the contrary, it is not only dangerous, it also brings convenience. Driverless vehicles can helps peoples save time and effort, it helps improve quality of life. For instance, the advantages of this technology is it can't violate traffic laws like running over the speed limit, drink alcohol while driving or blow the red light. It more secure than some drivers who are not serious. Furthermore, driverless vehicles will help reduce unnecessary costs, passengers may have to pay less fees for driveless cars than for cars with driver. And maybe they will have better experiences.
In summary, I see that driveless vehicles have both disadvantages and advantages. But the benefits of this technology are outweigh. Driverless cars, trucks, buses in the future will greatly supports human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018
- The graph below gives the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by train car and bus 73
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part time 73
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'help'.
Suggestion: help
...gs convenience. Driverless vehicles can helps peoples save time and effort, it helps ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the advantages of this technology is it cant violate traffic laws like running over ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...have better experiences. In summary, I see that driveless vehicles have both d...
^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...But the benefits of this technology are outweigh. Driverless cars, trucks, buses in the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in summary, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35907335907 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73325260217 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7790827968 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.75 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369625802179 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118084164398 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855023825198 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229741877254 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256851757811 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.