Sometimes spouses have to live far away from each other. Maintaining a long-distance relationship is sometimes difficult and straining.
What do you think are the main reasons of long-distance relationships?
What can be done to help couples feel closer?
The topic of remote communications between couples has always been considered as one of the problems attracting the most attention. Namely, the support of remote connection, appearing in the result of different reasons may be linked with emotional and technical issues. This essay will discuss the main causes associated with this issue and propose some possible solutions to overcome them.
To commence with, most common reasons for this form of contact are studying abroad and work- associated business trips. Since not all universities are provided with distance e-learning technologies, the gap may appear in case when at least one of the partners is a student. For example, ‘Synergy soviet of the MIET university’ journal reports, that many students of master’s degree program are forced to live separatly from their soulmate due to the program terms. As for job-linked travels, cases, requiring an employee’s removal, may also become a THE cause for OF driving apart. As statistic shows, one fifth of the `Tajikistan voice` survey contestants say, that they have relocated to the Russia in the demand of livelihood with their family left behind. Thus, various circumstances, tied with modern world conditions, make faraway kinship the usual practice nowadays.
A profound point consists in the utilization of social-media mobile apps, that are able to perform consolidation environment, in which feeling of proximity becomes feasible. VK (‘In the contact’), the vivid example, is a famous Russian social network, that creates a window of opportunity for spouses` rapprochement around the world. Another solution worth mentioning is new cutting-edge technology, that is, VR helmet with on-board video-chatting systems, which rapidly gains popularity in many countries. For instance, famous Apple Vision Pro VR glasses has already ousted many traditional ways of communicating, offering mind-blowing options for interacting in the way it usually performed eye-to-eye. Hence, availability of progressive concepts in the area of social engineering softens the placement difference aftermaths.
To conclude, long-distance relationships attributes should be should be relieved at the expense of developing of new interacting approaches. The importance of contemporary view is the very remedy to solve this problem at the global scale.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-13 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-31 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
- Students should focus on learning in the classroom rather than show their status by wearing fashionable clothes Therefore all students have to wear school uniforms Do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The internet has made knowledge immediately available to people through computers and smartphones all around the world Much of this knowledge is also free Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 92
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee getting a good job is to complete a course of university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work How far do you agree or disagree with the 89
- Sometimes spouses have to live far away from each other Maintaining a long distance relationship is sometimes difficult and straining What do you think are the main reasons for long distance relationships What can be done to help couples feel closer 89
- Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of teen deaths To prevent such road accidents the government should ban people under 24 to drive motorcycles To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'THE' is left.
Suggestion: a; THE
... an employee’s removal, may also become a THE cause for OF driving apart. As statist...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an employee’s removal, may also become a THE cause for OF driving apart. As stat...
^^
Line 2, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...val, may also become a THE cause for OF driving apart. As statistic shows, one f...
^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he way it usually performed eye-to-eye. Hence, availability of progressive conce...
^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'should be'.
Suggestion: should be
... long-distance relationships attributes should be should be relieved at the expense of developing o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, thus, as for, at least, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74358974359 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2067903256 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672364672365 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7428218248 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0832620193253 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244901944101 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387011139684 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559923008812 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405695877149 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'THE' is left.
Suggestion: a; THE
... an employee’s removal, may also become a THE cause for OF driving apart. As statist...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an employee’s removal, may also become a THE cause for OF driving apart. As stat...
^^
Line 2, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...val, may also become a THE cause for OF driving apart. As statistic shows, one f...
^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he way it usually performed eye-to-eye. Hence, availability of progressive conce...
^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'should be'.
Suggestion: should be
... long-distance relationships attributes should be should be relieved at the expense of developing o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, thus, as for, at least, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74358974359 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2067903256 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672364672365 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7428218248 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0832620193253 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244901944101 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387011139684 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559923008812 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405695877149 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.