Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often argued that families who send their kids to private schools should not be asked to pay taxes to support state education system. In my viewpoint, I completely agree with this argument that those who send their children to private educational institutions should not be forced to support state education system.
Firstly, enrolling children on private schools is significantly costly and families are going under a lot of pressure. The additional requirement to pay taxes for the public education system could make this burden worse, possibly causing stress on family. For instance, families that prioritize private education may exhaust their savings, leading to unstable financial conditions. The imposition of higher taxes could further intensify stress and dissatisfaction among these families. It is clearly unfair to subject them to such difficulties merely because they are pursuing the best educational options for their children.
However, it is essential to recognize that public schools are the responsibility of the state and require sufficient financial resources. Many citizens already contribute taxes in various forms, which should suffice to maintain public educational institutions placing further financial burdens on particular families. For example, limited financial resources frequently depend on public educational institutions, which are already supported by the majority of tax payers. Given that millions of citizens contribute taxes annually, the absence of contributions from a particular population characteristic should not pose a significant issue.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is unsuitable to impose further financial burdens on specific families based exclusively on their educational choices for their children. Instead, there should be mechanisms in place to provide support to these families.
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 84
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 84
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 61
- Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...tate education system. In my viewpoint, I completely agree with this argument tha...
^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... a significant issue. In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is unsuitable ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9037037037 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03720866724 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551851851852 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2433171448 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432636015169 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157256189135 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140918036845 0.0667982634062 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282851090304 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183730414984 0.056905535591 323% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.