The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In the leading of individuals across respective fields, the qualities of such a leader varies respectively; the goal of different leadership and occupation require different strategies. One thing is common, a perfect blend of cooperation and competition amongst leaders in different spheres. Though each method has their advantages, they are not of themselves better than the other.
In times of old, where nations were fighting for their independence from subjugation, a representative leader from the colonised people is one who understands the pain of all the class of persons, and effectively balances the need and ‘greed’ of their coloniser. Often, this understanding comes from having cooperated with everyone, and actually seeing and understanding their pain. Like in the case of Mandela from South Africa. Mandela was a young man who not only identified with his people, but also suffered as they did; He went to prison on his quest for his people's freedom for this purpose, and it was seen how all the people who worked with him, they all cooperated, with an understanding of commendary friendship, and the masses listened to him too. Mandela never lorded over his people, as their masters did, which was the difference they needed to fight for their independence. In a research conducted by Ruth Akpan, it was discovered that organisations whose leadership hand is cooperation, thrived successfully, and it is easier for these leaders to effectively cooperate with other people to achieve a goal. Though the time of fighting for independence has passed, instilling the art of cooperation among youngsters is important, as a cooperative individual is listened to easily and worked with genuinely.
Competition on the other end, amongst people, organisations, etc. allows rapid growth in a society. As seen in the financial world, different organisations struggle to attain the most profit, better than their counterpart. Though the superiority and other downsides that emerge are not wanted, we see everyone working to pass a milestone attained by another. Competition is also a way to identify the most competent amongst applicants in a job hunt. This strategy is applied in this modern time, whereby applicants are subjected to real-life scenarios. The best is the one who gets the job. So, training youngsters to compete is very invaluable.
However, when people only compete, there is a loss of understanding. Equity is lost, and those less able are not allowed to contribute. Through cooperation allows for a fair platform for all, it also breeds complacency amongst individuals. Critics, however, favour a strong competitor, on the bases that it is a 'Dog eat dog' society, totally eliminating the chance whatsoever for the less able, and narrowing the market size to just a few; we would run out of workers at this rate.
They fail to see the importance of both skill in a successful society. Thus, cooperation, balanced with healthy competition is the best way to go.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 79
- Education systems should focus more on imparting practical skills than on teaching theoretical knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you tak 53
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 70
- Authorities should prioritize addressing present day issues over anticipating and planning for future dilemmas Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sur 83
- As societies advance the preservation of cultural heritage becomes increasingly important even at the cost of modern development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2522.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24324324324 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07746104192 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0278516548 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.083333333 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0416666667 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04166666667 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16440895538 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423762561584 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389662782493 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793438906034 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302661054942 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.