Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, importance of parent’s duties to children behavior has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, “what are the positive and negative consequences?” Whereas it is a widely held view that monitor teenager is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychological standpoint, children reactions are bound up inextricably with parent’s actions, which indicates they lead to both high rate of juvenile delinquency and street crime. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship crime committed and alcoholic parents as well as an exponential increase in breaking law. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of occurring mass media is correlated negatively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of social science, without the slightest doubt, efficient educational systems attribute alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down to parents interventions, implications of divorce, social institutions. A salient example of such attribution is troubled childhood, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take lack of proper schooling. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint mental problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to motivation, adolescent, and even family support. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all`s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I highly agree that solo responsibility is of high importance. However, we perceive that with benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'parent'.
Suggestion: parent
...potheses, in that it would come down to parents interventions, implications of divorce,...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90492957746 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41015809581 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714788732394 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.223072461 50.4703680194 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132568547568 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331693278783 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041601286786 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730358856061 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287036213062 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.45 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 55.0591133005 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.94827586207 221% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.